On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:36 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:16:59 +0100
>
>> We can easily switch to new attributes. Should we introduce a new
>> interface for this?
>
> Yes.
okay, I will repost the patch with a new netlink attribute
--
To unsubsc
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:16:59 +0100
> We can easily switch to new attributes. Should we introduce a new
> interface for this?
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordom
Hi,
On 14.12.2015 12:48, Xin Long wrote:
>>
>> This is the wrong way to do this.
>>
>> Currently we only ever dump rta_cacheinfo values to the user.
>>
>> If we use it to set things, we have to completely consider every
>> member of that structure as potentially having meaning either
>> intended b
>
> This is the wrong way to do this.
>
> Currently we only ever dump rta_cacheinfo values to the user.
>
> If we use it to set things, we have to completely consider every
> member of that structure as potentially having meaning either
> intended by the user or choosen by us in the future.
>
> The
From: Xin Long
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:27:53 +0800
> Add the support for adding expire value to routes, requested by
> Tom Gundersen for systemd-networkd, and NetworkManager
> wants it too.
>
> add it by using the field rta_expires of rta_cacheinfo
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long
> Signed-off-
Add the support for adding expire value to routes, requested by
Tom Gundersen for systemd-networkd, and NetworkManager
wants it too.
add it by using the field rta_expires of rta_cacheinfo
Signed-off-by: Xin Long
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 11 +++
1 fil
