From: Xin Long
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 17:42:13 +0800
> Now we cannot distinguish that one sk is a udp or sctp style when
> we use ss to dump sctp_info. it's necessary to dump it as well.
>
> For sctp_diag, ss support is not officially available, thus there
> are no official users of this yet, so
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Now we cannot distinguish that one sk is a udp or sctp style when
> we use ss to dump sctp_info. it's necessary to dump it as well.
>
> For sctp_diag, ss support is not officially available, thus there
> are no official users of this yet,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Now we cannot distinguish that one sk is a udp or sctp style when
> we use ss to dump sctp_info. it's necessary to dump it as well.
>
> For sctp_diag, ss support is not officially available, thus there
> are no official users of this yet,
Now we cannot distinguish that one sk is a udp or sctp style when
we use ss to dump sctp_info. it's necessary to dump it as well.
For sctp_diag, ss support is not officially available, thus there
are no official users of this yet, so we can add this field in the
middle of sctp_info without breakin
