Re: [PATCHv2 ipsec-next 02/10] tunnel4: add cb_handler to struct xfrm_tunnel

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 4:54 AM kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi Xin, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on ipsec-next/master] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xin-Long/xfrm-support-ipip-and-ipv6-tunnels-in-vti-and-xfrmi/20200630-

Re: [PATCHv2 ipsec-next 02/10] tunnel4: add cb_handler to struct xfrm_tunnel

Hi Xin, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on ipsec-next/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xin-Long/xfrm-support-ipip-and-ipv6-tunnels-in-vti-and-xfrmi/20200630-154042 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/

Re: [PATCHv2 ipsec-next 02/10] tunnel4: add cb_handler to struct xfrm_tunnel

Hi Xin, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on ipsec-next/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xin-Long/xfrm-support-ipip-and-ipv6-tunnels-in-vti-and-xfrmi/20200630-154042 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/

[PATCHv2 ipsec-next 02/10] tunnel4: add cb_handler to struct xfrm_tunnel

This patch is to register a callback function tunnel4_rcv_cb with is_ipip set in a xfrm_input_afinfo object for tunnel4 and tunnel64. It will be called by xfrm_rcv_cb() from xfrm_input() when family is AF_INET and proto is IPPROTO_IPIP or IPPROTO_IPV6. v1->v2: - Fix a sparse warning caused by t