From: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:19:55 +0100
> I will start with the v4-side and post a small RFC patch to see whether
> I got the concepts right. (Due to vacation, this will not before mid/end
> of August.)
Ok, I look forward to reviewing it.
-
To unsubscribe f
Hi David,
thank you very much for taking time to revise the code
and for the detailed comments.
| The amount of code duplication is absolutely enormous and
| totally unnecessary.
You are right.
So far I thought it better to keep UDP and UDP-Lite separate but an
intelligent code integration d
From: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:19:02 +0100
> Generic support (header files, configuration, and documentation) for
> the UDP-Lite protocol (RFC 3828).
Gerrit, I tried to bring myself over the edge to accept this
work and push it into my net-2.6.19 tree, but I si
Quoting Herbert Xu:
| > case SO_NO_CHECK:
| > - sk->sk_no_check = valbool;
| > + /* UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) mandates checksumming,
| > + * hence user must not enable this option. */
| > + if (
Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> diff -Nurp a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> --- a/net/core/sock.c 2006-07-06 09:08:24.0 +0100
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c 2006-07-14 10:17:50.0 +0100
> @@ -479,7 +479,12 @@ set_rcvbuf:
>break;
>
>
Generic support (header files, configuration, and documentation)
for the UDP-Lite protocol (RFC 3828).
This has been tested successfully on AMD, i386/i686, and SMP
architectures (compiles cleanly and works under different configurations).
With regard to the previously submitted patch set, no conc
