On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:14:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ding Tianhong
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800
>
> > Hi David：
> >
> > I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to
> > tell the NIC
> > drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, an
From: Ding Tianhong
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800
> Hi David：
>
> I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to
> tell the NIC
> drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, and later we need send
> patch to enable
> RO for ixgbe driver base on this pat
On 2017/8/7 11:47, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ding Tianhong
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800
>
>> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
>> Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
>> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set
From: Ding Tianhong
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800
> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
> Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known
> devices with
Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known
devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the
cxgb4 dr
