From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:54:26 +0300
> This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
> rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
> My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase
> in networking, which isn't lockless, circular buffer
>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:54:26 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> Jesper, Jason, I know that both of you tested this,
> please post Tested-by tags for whatever was tested.
Yes, I tested this via "external" kernel modules, not your framework.
I have verified that this V8 patchset is equivalent,
This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase
in networking, which isn't lockless, circular buffer
with indices does not perform that well, because
each index access causes a c
