Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> I'd tend to agree that reset or abort would be preferable to destroy.
> After all... the socket doesn't actually go away.
Or maybe terminate? Reset kind of implies to me that it may resume operation.
Abort could be ok. I think terminate is somewhat more neutral, if
I'd tend to agree that reset or abort would be preferable to destroy.
After all... the socket doesn't actually go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
Please submit this with a proper "[PATCH vX 0/4] xxx" cover-letter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Thanks for the reviews. This version fixes a few issues and
addresses Tom's comments on v5. Specifically:
1. As requested by Tom, tcp_abort is no longer behind a config
option, and now allows the caller to specify the error with
which to interrupt blocking operations. (The SOCK_DIAG
codep
