On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:43:49AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I've reviewed the pending patches for the firmware_laoder and as for
> v4.18, the following 3 patches from Andres have been iterated enough
> that they're ready after I made some final minor changes, mostly just
> style
"Luis R. Rodriguez" writes:
> So we can nuke CONFIG_WANXL_BUILD_FIRMWARE now?
I'm uncertain I understand why do you want it, or maybe what are you
trying to do at all.
And what use would wanxlfw.S (the assembly source) have if the option is
removed?
>> It's more about delivering the .S source
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:17:08PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes:
>
> > * CONFIG_WANXL --> CONFIG_WANXL_BUILD_FIRMWARE
> > * CONFIG_SCSI_AIC79XX --> CONFIG_AIC79XX_BUILD_FIRMWARE
> >
> > To this day both of these drivers are building driver *firmwares* when
> > t
"Luis R. Rodriguez" writes:
> * CONFIG_WANXL --> CONFIG_WANXL_BUILD_FIRMWARE
> * CONFIG_SCSI_AIC79XX --> CONFIG_AIC79XX_BUILD_FIRMWARE
>
> To this day both of these drivers are building driver *firmwares* when
> the option CONFIG_PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD is disabled, and they don't
> even make
Greg,
I've reviewed the pending patches for the firmware_laoder and as for
v4.18, the following 3 patches from Andres have been iterated enough
that they're ready after I made some final minor changes, mostly just
style fixes and re-arrangements in terms of order. The new API he was
suggesting to
