On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:27:43 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:30:33PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:43:14 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > +struct ocelot_devlink_private {
>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:27:43 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:30:33PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:43:14 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > +struct ocelot_devlink_private {
> > > + struct ocelot *ocelot;
> > > +};
> >
> > I don't think you ev
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:30:33PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:43:14 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > +struct ocelot_devlink_private {
> > + struct ocelot *ocelot;
> > +};
>
> I don't think you ever explained to me why you don't put struct ocelot
> in the priv.
>
> -
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:43:14 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> +struct ocelot_devlink_private {
> + struct ocelot *ocelot;
> +};
I don't think you ever explained to me why you don't put struct ocelot
in the priv.
- ocelot = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ocelot), GFP_KERNEL);
- if
From: Vladimir Oltean
Add devlink integration into the mscc_ocelot switchdev driver. All
physical ports (i.e. the unused ones as well) except the CPU port module
at ocelot->num_phys_ports are registered with devlink, and that requires
keeping the devlink_port structure outside struct ocelot_port_
