Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] inet: Remove an unnecessary argument of syn_ack_recalc().

2020-07-10 Thread David Miller
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:57:59 +0900 > Commit 0c3d79bce48034018e840468ac5a642894a521a3 ("tcp: reduce SYN-ACK > retrans for TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT") introduces syn_ack_recalc() which decides > if a minisock is held and a SYN+ACK is retransmitted or not. > > If rskq_defer_accept

Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] inet: Remove an unnecessary argument of syn_ack_recalc().

2020-07-10 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 7/10/20 8:57 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > Commit 0c3d79bce48034018e840468ac5a642894a521a3 ("tcp: reduce SYN-ACK > retrans for TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT") introduces syn_ack_recalc() which decides > if a minisock is held and a SYN+ACK is retransmitted or not. > > If rskq_defer_accept is not zero in

[PATCH v4 net-next] inet: Remove an unnecessary argument of syn_ack_recalc().

2020-07-10 Thread Kuniyuki Iwashima
Commit 0c3d79bce48034018e840468ac5a642894a521a3 ("tcp: reduce SYN-ACK retrans for TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT") introduces syn_ack_recalc() which decides if a minisock is held and a SYN+ACK is retransmitted or not. If rskq_defer_accept is not zero in syn_ack_recalc(), max_retries always has the same value be