On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:14:22 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> So now we're beginning to dance around timeout boundaries - how can we
> define the beginning and end of a timeout boundary, and how do they
> relate to the component and label? Currently, if either the component
> or status_msg changes
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:11:06 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 9/15/20 12:00 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:44:07 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> >> Exactly how I saw it.
> >>
> >> Basically, the timeout should take effect as long as the (component,
> >> msg) pair stays the same.
On 9/15/20 12:00 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:44:07 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
Exactly how I saw it.
Basically, the timeout should take effect as long as the (component,
msg) pair stays the same.
So if you send percentage reports with the same message and component,
then the
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:44:07 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> Exactly how I saw it.
>
> Basically, the timeout should take effect as long as the (component,
> msg) pair stays the same.
>
> So if you send percentage reports with the same message and component,
> then the timeout stays in effect. Once y
On 9/15/2020 10:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:20:11 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> What should the userland program do when the timeout expires? Start
> counting backwards? Stop waiting? Do we care to define this at the
> moment?
[component] bla bla
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:20:11 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >>> What should the userland program do when the timeout expires? Start
> >>> counting backwards? Stop waiting? Do we care to define this at the
> >>> moment?
> >> [component] bla bla X% (timeout reached)
> >
> > Yep. I don't think
On 9/15/20 9:50 AM, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Kicinski
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:51 AM
To: Shannon Nelson
Cc: Keller, Jacob E ; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
da...@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] ionic: add devlink firmware update
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Kicinski
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:51 AM
> To: Shannon Nelson
> Cc: Keller, Jacob E ; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> da...@davemloft.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] ionic: add devlink firmware update
>
> O
On 9/14/20 5:53 PM, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Shannon Nelson
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:47 PM
To: Jakub Kicinski ; Keller, Jacob E
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] ionic: add devlink firmware update
On
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org On
> Behalf Of Jakub Kicinski
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:36 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: Shannon Nelson ; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> da...@davemloft.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next
On 9/14/20 4:36 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:15:28 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
On 9/10/2020 10:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
IOW drop the component parameter from the normal helper, cause almost
nobody uses that. The add a more full featured __ version, which would
take the arg
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:15:28 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 9/10/2020 10:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > IOW drop the component parameter from the normal helper, cause almost
> > nobody uses that. The add a more full featured __ version, which would
> > take the arg struct, the struct would includ
On 9/10/2020 10:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:34:57 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> On 9/9/20 12:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
I'm suggesting that this implementation using the existing devlink
logg
On 9/10/2020 10:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> IOW drop the component parameter from the normal helper, cause almost
> nobody uses that. The add a more full featured __ version, which would
> take the arg struct, the struct would include the timeout value.
>
I would point out that the ice drive
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:02:18 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 9/10/20 10:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:34:57 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >> On 9/9/20 12:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> I'm suggesting
On 9/10/20 10:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:34:57 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
On 9/9/20 12:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
I'm suggesting that this implementation using the existing devlink
logging services should suffic
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:34:57 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 9/9/20 12:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm suggesting that this implementation using the existing devlink
> >> logging services should suffice until someone can desig
On 9/9/20 12:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
I'm suggesting that this implementation using the existing devlink
logging services should suffice until someone can design, implement, and
get accepted a different bit of plumbing. Unfortunately,
From: Shannon Nelson
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700
> I'm suggesting that this implementation using the existing devlink
> logging services should suffice until someone can design, implement,
> and get accepted a different bit of plumbing. Unfortunately, that's
> not a job that I can get t
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:58:19 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 9/9/20 9:44 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:23:08 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >> On 9/8/20 4:54 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:12 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> +dl = priv
On 9/9/20 9:44 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:23:08 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
On 9/8/20 4:54 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:12 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
+ dl = priv_to_devlink(ionic);
+ devlink_flash_update_status_notify(dl, label, NULL, 1,
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:23:08 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 9/8/20 4:54 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:12 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >> + dl = priv_to_devlink(ionic);
> >> + devlink_flash_update_status_notify(dl, label, NULL, 1, timeout);
> >> + start_time = jiffie
On 9/8/20 4:54 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:12 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
+ dl = priv_to_devlink(ionic);
+ devlink_flash_update_status_notify(dl, label, NULL, 1, timeout);
+ start_time = jiffies;
+ end_time = start_time + (timeout * HZ);
+ do
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:12 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> + dl = priv_to_devlink(ionic);
> + devlink_flash_update_status_notify(dl, label, NULL, 1, timeout);
> + start_time = jiffies;
> + end_time = start_time + (timeout * HZ);
> + do {
> + mutex_lock(&ionic->dev_cm
Add support for firmware update through the devlink interface.
This update copies the firmware object into the device, asks
the current firmware to install it, then asks the firmware to
select the new firmware for the next boot-up.
The install and select steps are launched as asynchronous
requests
25 matches
Mail list logo
