From: David Ahern
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 22:54:07 -0400
> On 4/8/17 10:33 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Ahern
>> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 18:24:06 -0400
>>
>>> per comments on the email thread about reducing notifications, the
>>> kernel patch for this should be reverted (and hence this ip
On 4/8/17 10:33 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern
> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 18:24:06 -0400
>
>> per comments on the email thread about reducing notifications, the
>> kernel patch for this should be reverted (and hence this iproute2 patch
>> is not needed) in favor of using a bitmask. Righ
From: David Ahern
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 18:24:06 -0400
> per comments on the email thread about reducing notifications, the
> kernel patch for this should be reverted (and hence this iproute2 patch
> is not needed) in favor of using a bitmask. Right now there are too many
> redundant notification
On 4/4/17 9:25 AM, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> Add IFLA_EVENT handling so that event types can be viewed with
> 'monitor' command. This gives a little more information for why
> a given message was receivied.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich
> ---
> include/linux/if_link.h | 21 +++
Add IFLA_EVENT handling so that event types can be viewed with
'monitor' command. This gives a little more information for why
a given message was receivied.
Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich
---
include/linux/if_link.h | 21 +
ip/ipaddress.c | 31 ++
