On 03/08/2019 05:45 PM, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 05:18:14AM +, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote:
>> we could end up in situation when we have object file w/ all btf
>> info but kernel does not support btf yet. in this situation currently
>> libbpf just set obj->btf to NULL w/o freein
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 05:18:14AM +, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote:
> we could end up in situation when we have object file w/ all btf
> info but kernel does not support btf yet. in this situation currently
> libbpf just set obj->btf to NULL w/o freeing it first.
> this patch if fixing it by making
On 03/08/2019 06:18 AM, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote:
> we could end up in situation when we have object file w/ all btf
> info but kernel does not support btf yet. in this situation currently
> libbpf just set obj->btf to NULL w/o freeing it first.
> this patch if fixing it by making sure to run btf__
On 3/7/19 9:18 PM, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote:
> we could end up in situation when we have object file w/ all btf
> info but kernel does not support btf yet. in this situation currently
> libbpf just set obj->btf to NULL w/o freeing it first.
> this patch if fixing it by making sure to run btf__fre
we could end up in situation when we have object file w/ all btf
info but kernel does not support btf yet. in this situation currently
libbpf just set obj->btf to NULL w/o freeing it first.
this patch if fixing it by making sure to run btf__free first
v2->v3:
- adding "Fixes" tag
v1->v2:
- addi
