On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 05:05, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:45 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> >
> > That's what I had initially, but that makes re-using test_attr really
> > awkward. Either
> > you need to reset data_out_size before every call because it is used
> > to return
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:45 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
>
> That's what I had initially, but that makes re-using test_attr really
> awkward. Either
> you need to reset data_out_size before every call because it is used
> to return the
> buffer size,
I think that is exactly what the user of the interf
On 11/26/2018 01:45 PM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 22:20, Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2018 03:09 PM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
[...]
LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_test_run(int prog_fd, int repeat, void *da
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 22:20, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 11/22/2018 03:09 PM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> > > Add a new function, which encourages safe usage of the test interface.
> > > bpf_prog_test_run continues to work as bef
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/22/2018 03:09 PM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> > Add a new function, which encourages safe usage of the test interface.
> > bpf_prog_test_run continues to work as before, but should be considered
> > unsafe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: L
On 11/22/2018 03:09 PM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> Add a new function, which encourages safe usage of the test interface.
> bpf_prog_test_run continues to work as before, but should be considered
> unsafe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer
Set looks good to me, thanks! Three small things below:
> ---
Add a new function, which encourages safe usage of the test interface.
bpf_prog_test_run continues to work as before, but should be considered
unsafe.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer
---
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 27 +++
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 13 +
2 files changed, 40
