RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: dsa: ocelot: Add support for QinQ Operation

2020-07-22 Thread Hongbo Wang
> Instead of writing a long email, let me just say this. > I ran your commands on 2 random network cards (not ocelot/felix ports). > They don't produce the same results as you. In fact, no frame with VLAN > 111 C-TAG is forwarded (or received) at all by the bridge, not to mention that > no VLAN 100

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: dsa: ocelot: Add support for QinQ Operation

2020-07-22 Thread Vladimir Oltean
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 06:32:00PM +0800, hongbo.w...@nxp.com wrote: > From: "hongbo.wang" > > This featue can be test using network test tools > TX-tool -> swp0 -> swp1 -> RX-tool > > TX-tool simulates Customer that will send and receive packets with single > VLAN tag(CTAG), RX

[PATCH v3 2/2] net: dsa: ocelot: Add support for QinQ Operation

2020-07-22 Thread hongbo . wang
From: "hongbo.wang" This featue can be test using network test tools TX-tool -> swp0 -> swp1 -> RX-tool TX-tool simulates Customer that will send and receive packets with single VLAN tag(CTAG), RX-tool simulates Service-Provider that will send and receive packets with double VLA