On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:31:42AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:32:59PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:36:38AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:32:59PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:36:38AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 a
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:36:38AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 1
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > Hi Marcelo,
> > > >
> > >
On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > Hi Marcelo,
> > >
> > > a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
> > >
> > > On
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 19:08, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > From:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 19:08, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> >
> > That's needed for the next patch, so we break the
Hi Marcelo,
a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 19:08, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>
> That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
> netns_sctp->addr_wq_lock and socket lock on
> sctp
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:08:05PM -0300, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>
> That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
> netns_sctp->addr_wq_lock and socket lock on
> sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(). With this, we can traverse addr_waitq
>
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
netns_sctp->addr_wq_lock and socket lock on
sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(). With this, we can traverse addr_waitq
without taking addr_wq_lock, taking it just for the write operations.
Signed-of
10 matches
Mail list logo