On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:50 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:55:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:35 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:37:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 27,
Hi Rafael,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:55:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:35 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:37:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:16 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 20
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:35 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:37:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:16 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:29 AM Zhang Qilong
> > > wrote:
> > > > In many case, we need to check re
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:37:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:16 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:29 AM Zhang Qilong
> > wrote:
> > > In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
> > > it brings a trouble to t
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:16 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> Hi Zhang,
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:29 AM Zhang Qilong wrote:
> > In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
> > it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers forget
> > to decreas
Hi Zhang,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:29 AM Zhang Qilong wrote:
> In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
> it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers forget
> to decrease the usage counter when it failed, which could resulted in
> reference l
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:25 AM Zhang Qilong wrote:
>
> In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
> it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers forget
> to decrease the usage counter when it failed, which could resulted in
> reference leak. It h
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:29:32 +0800 Zhang Qilong wrote:
> In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
> it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers forget
> to decrease the usage counter when it failed, which could resulted in
> reference leak. It ha
In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers forget
to decrease the usage counter when it failed, which could resulted in
reference leak. It has been discussed a lot[0][1]. So we add a function
to deal with
