On 3/30/2016 6:44 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
Hello Tomeu
On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Thanks.
Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that
88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
> Hello Tomeu
>
> On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that
>> 88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression") got in
>> there, so I gu
Hello Tomeu
On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Thanks.
Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that
88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression") got in
there, so I guess we have now a bunch of boards with broken network on
that release:(
This
On 14 March 2016 at 17:20, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hi Tomeu
>
> On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peppe,
>>
>> with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup.
>>
>> So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still
>> get the hang during boot:
Hi Tomeu
On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi Peppe,
with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup.
So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still
get the hang during boot:
209afef6f0cd ARM: dts: rockchip: Add mdio node to ethernet node
2315acc6cf
On 11 March 2016 at 10:09, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> On 3/10/2016 5:47 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
>
Hi
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
>> PHY:
>>
>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>> stmmac_open: Cannot att
On 3/10/2016 5:47 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas
I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the
tx timeout.
The
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
> On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas
>>>
>>> I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the
>>> tx timeout.
>>>
>>> The "stmmac: MD
On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas
I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the
tx timeout.
The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to
fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (And
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
> Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas
>
> I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the
> tx timeout.
>
> The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to
> fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (Andreas' comment).
>
> So, supposi
Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas
I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the
tx timeout.
The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to
fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (Andreas' comment).
So, supposing the probe is ok and phy is connected,
I need your input ...
Tomeu: a
Hi Tomeu
On 3/9/2016 11:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 9 March 2016 at 11:27, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hello Tomeu, Andreas,
On 3/9/2016 10:52 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
* today's linux-next: probe failed
* today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No
PHY found' reg
On 9 March 2016 at 11:27, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hello Tomeu, Andreas,
>
> On 3/9/2016 10:52 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
>>>
>>> * today's linux-next: probe failed
>>>
>>> * today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No
>>> PHY found' regression: probe succeeded but no n
Hello Tomeu, Andreas,
On 3/9/2016 10:52 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
* today's linux-next: probe failed
* today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No
PHY found' regression: probe succeeded but no network at all
* today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 (stmmac: Fix '
On 3/9/2016 10:42 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 9 March 2016 at 10:00, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
On 3/9/2016 9:56 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hello
On 3/9/2016 9:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
in order to get the onboard network on the Radxa Rock2 to work at all
on today's linux-next, I had to
On 9 March 2016 at 10:00, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> On 3/9/2016 9:56 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> On 3/9/2016 9:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> in order to get the onboard network on the Radxa Rock2 to work at all
>>> on today's linux-next, I had to revert both commits:
On 3/9/2016 9:56 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hello
On 3/9/2016 9:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
in order to get the onboard network on the Radxa Rock2 to work at all
on today's linux-next, I had to revert both commits:
* "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression" for the drivers to
probe and
Hello
On 3/9/2016 9:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
in order to get the onboard network on the Radxa Rock2 to work at all
on today's linux-next, I had to revert both commits:
* "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression" for the drivers to
probe and the link to come up, and
I've just sent two p
On 8 March 2016 at 16:45, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
> wrote:
>> Hi Dinh,
>>
>> On 3/8/2016 12:22 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform:
>>>
>>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
>>> eth0:
Hi Dinh
On 3/8/2016 4:45 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
Hi Dinh,
On 3/8/2016 12:22 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform:
libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
eth0: Could not attach to PHY
stmma
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
>
> On 3/8/2016 12:22 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>>
>> I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform:
>>
>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY
On 8 March 2016 at 11:24, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> On 3/8/2016 11:03 AM, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andreas and Dinh Thanks for your feedback i will check it.
>
>
> hmm, I was looking at the code and indeed I have some doubt on
> mdio_bus_data management that the patch changes explainin
On 3/8/2016 11:03 AM, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
Hi Andreas and Dinh Thanks for your feedback i will check it.
hmm, I was looking at the code and indeed I have some doubt on
mdio_bus_data management that the patch changes explaining
why the Andreas's box fails and phy_add is not detected.
Keep
Hi Andreas and Dinh Thanks for your feedback i will check it.
Best regards
Gabriel
On 8 March 2016 at 00:22, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 07.03.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
>>> On 3/7/2016 4:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am
Hi Dinh,
On 3/8/2016 12:22 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform:
libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
eth0: Could not attach to PHY
stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
If I just revert:
"stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 07.03.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
>> On 3/7/2016 4:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 07.03.2016 um 16:09 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
On 3/7/2016 3:27 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Indeed, reverting Gabriel's commit
Am 07.03.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
> On 3/7/2016 4:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 07.03.2016 um 16:09 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
>>> On 3/7/2016 3:27 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Indeed, reverting Gabriel's commit fixes the observed error messages
>> [...]
However, I am
On 3/7/2016 4:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Peppe,
Am 07.03.2016 um 16:09 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
On 3/7/2016 3:27 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Indeed, reverting Gabriel's commit fixes the observed error messages
[...]
However, I am unable to ping any hosts on the network now.
hmm, this
Hi Peppe,
Am 07.03.2016 um 16:09 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
> On 3/7/2016 3:27 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Indeed, reverting Gabriel's commit fixes the observed error messages
[...]
>> However, I am unable to ping any hosts on the network now.
>
> hmm, this could be another problem. I wonder if
Hi Andreas
On 3/7/2016 3:27 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hello Giuseppe,
Am 07.03.2016 um 14:26 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
On 3/7/2016 1:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53
Hello Giuseppe,
Am 07.03.2016 um 14:26 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
> On 3/7/2016 1:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
>>> Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> On next-20160304
Hello Andreas, Heiko,
On 3/7/2016 1:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer fi
Hi Heiko,
Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
>>> PHY:
>>>
>>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not fou
Hi Andreas,
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> > On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
> > PHY:
> >
> > libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
> > eth0: Could not attach to PHY
> > stmma
Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the PHY:
>
> libphy: PHY stmmac-0: not found
> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
Still with us in next-20160307. CC'ing stmma
36 matches
Mail list logo
