On 04/10/16 13:47, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel
>>
>> Instead of only placing one skb on the guest rx ring at a time, process
>> a batch of up-to 64. This improves performance by ~10% in some tests.
>
> And doe
> -Original Message-
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.w...@oracle.com]
> Sent: 04 October 2016 13:48
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu
> ; David Vrabel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 net-
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> From: David Vrabel
>
> Instead of only placing one skb on the guest rx ring at a time, process
> a batch of up-to 64. This improves performance by ~10% in some tests.
And does it regress latency workloads?
What are those 'some tes
From: David Vrabel
Instead of only placing one skb on the guest rx ring at a time, process
a batch of up-to 64. This improves performance by ~10% in some tests.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel
[re-based]
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant
---
Cc: Wei Liu
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c | 15 +
