On 2016/12/14 23:34, woojung@microchip.com wrote:
>> I just want to commit the unregister patch and found this patch. Good job!
>> But I consider this patch may miss something.
>> If one SoC has 2 MAC ports and each port uses the different network driver,
>> the 2 drivers may register fixup fo
> I just want to commit the unregister patch and found this patch. Good job!
> But I consider this patch may miss something.
> If one SoC has 2 MAC ports and each port uses the different network driver,
> the 2 drivers may register fixup for the same PHY chip with different
> "run" function because
Hi all,
On 2016/12/8 4:26, woojung@microchip.com wrote:
>>From : Woojung Huh
>
> Add functions to unregister phy fixup for modules.
>
> int phy_unregister_fixup(const char *bus_id, u32 phy_uid, u32 phy_uid_mask)
> Unregister phy fixup from phy_fixup_list per bus_id, phy_uid &
>
>From : Woojung Huh
Add functions to unregister phy fixup for modules.
int phy_unregister_fixup(const char *bus_id, u32 phy_uid, u32 phy_uid_mask)
Unregister phy fixup from phy_fixup_list per bus_id, phy_uid &
phy_uid_mask
int phy_unregister_fixup_for_uid(u32 phy_uid, u32 phy_ui
