On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:26:34PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:51:46AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Simon Horman
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:52:3
Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:51:46AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Simon Horman
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:52:32AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ji
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:52:32AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> > Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:31:41PM CET, simon.hor...@ne
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:52:32AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:31:41PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >>Allow dissection of ICMP(V6) type and code. This
Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:23:16PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:52:32AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:31:41PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >>Allow dissection of ICMP(V6) ty
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:52:32AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:31:41PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >>Allow dissection of ICMP(V6) type and code. This re-uses transport layer
> >>port dissection code as altho
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:31:41PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>>Allow dissection of ICMP(V6) type and code. This re-uses transport layer
>>port dissection code as although ICMP is not a transport protocol and their
>>type and code are no
Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:31:41PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>Allow dissection of ICMP(V6) type and code. This re-uses transport layer
>port dissection code as although ICMP is not a transport protocol and their
>type and code are not ports this allows sharing of both code and storage.
>
Allow dissection of ICMP(V6) type and code. This re-uses transport layer
port dissection code as although ICMP is not a transport protocol and their
type and code are not ports this allows sharing of both code and storage.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +++-