On 4/28/19 11:53 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Adding tests as we go along would immensely help too.
> Unfortunately afaik there is no test infra to use for it.
pcpu routes are the predominant ones used for traffic. We have a number
of existing tests in selftests - fib_tests.sh - that exercise
On 4/28/19 9:06 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> I would prefer we fix the existing bugs before moving the code around,
> otherwise stable teams work is going to be tough.
>
fair enough. I'll drop the ipv6 patches and re-send just the v4 ones.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 8:10 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/27/19 7:27 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> > From: David Ahern
> >
> > This series moves IPv4 pcpu cached routes from fib_nh to fib_nh_common
> > to make the caches avaialable for IPv6 nexthops (fib6_nh) with IPv4
> > routes. This allows a
On 4/27/19 7:27 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> From: David Ahern
>
> This series moves IPv4 pcpu cached routes from fib_nh to fib_nh_common
> to make the caches avaialable for IPv6 nexthops (fib6_nh) with IPv4
> routes. This allows a fib6_nh struct to be used with both IPv4 and
> and IPv6 routes.
>
From: David Ahern
This series moves IPv4 pcpu cached routes from fib_nh to fib_nh_common
to make the caches avaialable for IPv6 nexthops (fib6_nh) with IPv4
routes. This allows a fib6_nh struct to be used with both IPv4 and
and IPv6 routes.
In addition pcpu caches and exception entries for IPv6
