On 10/31/16 at 11:16am, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/31/16 11:01 AM, David Miller wrote:
> > Also, any reason why you don't allow the cgroup bpf sk filter to return
> > an error code so that the sock creation could be cancelled if the eBPF
> > program desires that? It could be useful, I suppose.
>
On 10/31/16 11:01 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:58:37 -0700
>
>> The recently added VRF support in Linux leverages the bind-to-device
>> API for programs to specify an L3 domain for a socket. While
>> SO_BINDTODEVICE has been around for ages, not every ip
From: David Ahern
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:58:37 -0700
> The recently added VRF support in Linux leverages the bind-to-device
> API for programs to specify an L3 domain for a socket. While
> SO_BINDTODEVICE has been around for ages, not every ipv4/ipv6 capable
> program has support for it. Even
The recently added VRF support in Linux leverages the bind-to-device
API for programs to specify an L3 domain for a socket. While
SO_BINDTODEVICE has been around for ages, not every ipv4/ipv6 capable
program has support for it. Even for those programs that do support it,
the API requires processes
