On 16-06-18 12:31 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:15:27 -0400
Ok, mystery solved. Dave, this patch series is missing from current
net-next.
Then what is:
commit 53eb440f4ada034ea43b295891feec3df0fa7a29
/blink, blink
sorry ;-> I should have pulled b
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:15:27 -0400
> Ok, mystery solved. Dave, this patch series is missing from current
> net-next.
Then what is:
commit 53eb440f4ada034ea43b295891feec3df0fa7a29
Author: Jamal Hadi Salim
Date: Mon Jun 6 06:32:54 2016 -0400
net sched actions: in
Ok, mystery solved. Dave, this patch series is missing from current
net-next.
cheers,
jamal
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] net sched action timestamp improvements
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller
To: j...@mojatatu.com
CC
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 06:32:52 -0400
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
>
> Various aggregations of duplicated code, fixes and introduction of firstused
> timestamp
>
> v2: add const for source time info per suggestion from Cong
Series applied.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
>
> Various aggregations of duplicated code, fixes and introduction of firstused
> timestamp
>
> v2: add const for source time info per suggestion from Cong
For this whole series,
Acked-by: Cong Wang
Thanks!
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Various aggregations of duplicated code, fixes and introduction of firstused
timestamp
v2: add const for source time info per suggestion from Cong
Jamal Hadi Salim (3):
net sched: actions use tcf_lastuse_update for consistency
net sched actions: introduce timestamp fo
