From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:56:45 -0400
> It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level
> _mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On Nov. Monday 02 (45) 04:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:56:45PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level
> > _mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivien
Hi Andrew,
On Nov. Monday 02 (45) 04:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:56:45PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level
> > _mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them.
> >
> > Signed-of
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:56:45PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level
> _mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn
Since there is no followup
It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level
_mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 25 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --g
