On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 1:13 PM Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:41:50AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
> > have valid BPF object files with valid BTF information, that still won't
> > load success
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:41:50AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
> have valid BPF object files with valid BTF information, that still won't
> load successfully due to Clang emitting newer BTF features (e.g.,
> BTF_KIND_FUNC
Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
have valid BPF object files with valid BTF information, that still won't
load successfully due to Clang emitting newer BTF features (e.g.,
BTF_KIND_FUNC, .BTF.ext's line_info/func_info, BTF_KIND_DATASEC, etc), that
are not ye
