On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> This changes several users of manual "on"/"off" parsing to use strtobool.
>>> (Which means they will now parse y/n/1/0 meaningfully
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> This changes several users of manual "on"/"off" parsing to use strtobool.
>> (Which means they will now parse y/n/1/0 meaningfully too.)
>>
>
> I like this change, but can you carefully c
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This changes several users of manual "on"/"off" parsing to use strtobool.
> (Which means they will now parse y/n/1/0 meaningfully too.)
>
I like this change, but can you carefully check the acceptance of the
returned value?
Briefly I saw 1 or 0
This changes several users of manual "on"/"off" parsing to use strtobool.
(Which means they will now parse y/n/1/0 meaningfully too.)
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman
Cc: x...@kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
