Hi Daniel,
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc3 next-20160824]
[cannot apply to linus/master linux/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --ba
Hi Tejun,
On 08/24/2016 11:54 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:24:19PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> +void cgroup_bpf_free(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>> +{
>> +unsigned int type;
>> +
>> +rcu_read_lock();
>> +
>> +for (type = 0; type < __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE; type++) {
>> +
Hello, Daniel.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:24:19PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> +void cgroup_bpf_free(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +{
> + unsigned int type;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + for (type = 0; type < __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE; type++) {
> + if (!cgrp->bpf.prog[type])
> +
This patch adds two sets of eBPF program pointers to struct cgroup.
One for such that are directly pinned to a cgroup, and one for such
that are effective for it.
To illustrate the logic behind that, assume the following example
cgroup hierarchy.
A - B - C
\ D - E
If only B has a progr
