Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Hello Kalle, On 06/22/2016 02:17 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Javier Martinez Canillas writes: > Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3. Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a v3 with only patches 1/3 and 3/3? >>> >>> I can drop patch 2, no need to resend.

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Javier Martinez Canillas writes: >>> Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3. >>> Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a v3 >>> with only patches 1/3 and 3/3? >> >> I can drop patch 2, no need to resend. Thanks. >> > > I saw that you sent your pull request for v4.8

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Hello Kalle, On 06/10/2016 03:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Javier Martinez Canillas writes: > >>> This patch (2/3) is only for code rearrangement and adds an >>> unnecessary wrapper function. We can simply drop the patch. >> >> Agreed. >> >> Kalle, >> >> Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after droppi

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Javier Martinez Canillas writes: >> This patch (2/3) is only for code rearrangement and adds an >> unnecessary wrapper function. We can simply drop the patch. > > Agreed. > > Kalle, > > Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3. > Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

ngzhen Li; Enric >> Balletbo i Serra; Amitkumar Karwar; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- >> wirel...@vger.kernel.org; Nishant Sarmukadam >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station >> ioctl file >> >> Hello Kalle, >> >>

RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

linux- > wirel...@vger.kernel.org; Nishant Sarmukadam > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station > ioctl file > > Hello Kalle, > > On 06/10/2016 10:30 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > > Javier Martinez Canillas writes: > > > >> From: Sh

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Hello Kalle, On 06/10/2016 10:30 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Javier Martinez Canillas writes: > >> From: Shengzhen Li >> >> Most cfg80211 operations are just a wrappers to functions defined in the >> sta_ioctl.c file, so for consistency move the .get_tx_power logic there. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sheng

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Javier Martinez Canillas writes: > From: Shengzhen Li > > Most cfg80211 operations are just a wrappers to functions defined in the > sta_ioctl.c file, so for consistency move the .get_tx_power logic there. > > Signed-off-by: Shengzhen Li > Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar > [javier: update the

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

2016-06-06 19:02 GMT+02:00 Javier Martinez Canillas : > From: Shengzhen Li > > Most cfg80211 operations are just a wrappers to functions defined in the > sta_ioctl.c file, so for consistency move the .get_tx_power logic there. > > Signed-off-by: Shengzhen Li > Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar > [

[PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

From: Shengzhen Li Most cfg80211 operations are just a wrappers to functions defined in the sta_ioctl.c file, so for consistency move the .get_tx_power logic there. Signed-off-by: Shengzhen Li Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar [javier: update the subject line and commit message] Signed-off-by: J