Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-23 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:54 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 21:53 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > > I noticed funny behavior about $stat matches - > > it reports the same error several times (including as "scope" whole file) > > Is it feature or "feature" or I missed something

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-23 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 21:53 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > On 22.04.2015 00:27, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 23:44 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > >> On 21.04.2015 23:22, Joe Perches wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 22:57 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > >> (...) > (...)

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-23 Thread Mateusz Kulikowski
On 22.04.2015 00:27, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 23:44 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >> On 21.04.2015 23:22, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 22:57 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >> (...) (...) >> True, True; If you prefer $line and ability to --fix - I'll use that i

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 23:44 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > On 21.04.2015 23:22, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 22:57 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > (...) > >> > >> Perhaps it would be smarter to use (for both patches) $stat instead. > >> This applies also to existing checks (l

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-21 Thread Mateusz Kulikowski
On 21.04.2015 23:22, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 22:57 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: (...) >> >> Perhaps it would be smarter to use (for both patches) $stat instead. >> This applies also to existing checks (like PREFER_ETHER_ADDR_COPY) >> so we can catch calls formatted like >> >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 22:57 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On 20.04.2015 03:13, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 00:16 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > >> Suggest using eth_zero_addr() or eth_broadcast_addr() instead of memset(). > > > > Hi again Mateusz > > > >> d

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-21 Thread Mateusz Kulikowski
Hi Joe, On 20.04.2015 03:13, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 00:16 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >> Suggest using eth_zero_addr() or eth_broadcast_addr() instead of memset(). > > Hi again Mateusz > >> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > [] >> @@ -5042,6 +5

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-19 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 00:16 +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > Suggest using eth_zero_addr() or eth_broadcast_addr() instead of memset(). Hi again Mateusz > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl [] > @@ -5042,6 +5042,22 @@ sub process { >"Prefer et

[PATCH v2 2/2] checkpatch: suggest using eth_zero_addr() and eth_broadcast_addr()

2015-04-19 Thread Mateusz Kulikowski
Suggest using eth_zero_addr() or eth_broadcast_addr() instead of memset(). Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kulikowski --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index b9ea436..aee6d43 100755 --- a/scripts/c