On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 02:16:12PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/26/21 2:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > + /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_not_held()
> > > + * and lockdep_assert_held()
> > > + */
On 2/26/21 2:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
+ /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_not_held()
+* and lockdep_assert_held()
+*/
That's a coding style fail.
Checkpatch didn't complain. Wh
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> + /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_not_held()
> + * and lockdep_assert_held()
> + */
That's a coding style fail.
Some kernel functions must be called without holding a specific lock.
Add lockdep_assert_not_held() to be used in these functions to detect
incorrect calls while holding a lock.
lockdep_assert_not_held() provides the opposite functionality of
lockdep_assert_held() which is used to assert calls tha
