Doug Anderson writes:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:51 AM Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> > If we have a per CE (Copy Engine) IRQ then we have no summary
>> > register. Right now the code generates a summary register by
>> > iterating over all copy engines and seeing if the
Douglas Anderson wrote:
> If we have a per CE (Copy Engine) IRQ then we have no summary
> register. Right now the code generates a summary register by
> iterating over all copy engines and seeing if they have an interrupt
> pending.
>
> This has a problem. Specifically if _none_ if the Copy En
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:51 AM Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> > If we have a per CE (Copy Engine) IRQ then we have no summary
> > register. Right now the code generates a summary register by
> > iterating over all copy engines and seeing if they have an interrupt
> > pen
Douglas Anderson wrote:
> If we have a per CE (Copy Engine) IRQ then we have no summary
> register. Right now the code generates a summary register by
> iterating over all copy engines and seeing if they have an interrupt
> pending.
>
> This has a problem. Specifically if _none_ if the Copy En
Kalle,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:22 AM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> If we have a per CE (Copy Engine) IRQ then we have no summary
> register. Right now the code generates a summary register by
> iterating over all copy engines and seeing if they have an interrupt
> pending.
>
> This has a problem.
If we have a per CE (Copy Engine) IRQ then we have no summary
register. Right now the code generates a summary register by
iterating over all copy engines and seeing if they have an interrupt
pending.
This has a problem. Specifically if _none_ if the Copy Engines have
an interrupt pending then t