On 10/1/15 9:19 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Sent: 30 September 2015 18:24
...
This is being addressed by simply using per bucket rw lock which makes the
locking simple and very efficient. The hash table size is still an issue and
I plan to address it by using re-sizable has
From: Santosh Shilimkar
> Sent: 30 September 2015 18:24
...
> This is being addressed by simply using per bucket rw lock which makes the
> locking simple and very efficient. The hash table size is still an issue and
> I plan to address it by using re-sizable hash tables as suggested on the list.
I
[v2]:
Dropped "[PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K" from
earlier version [1]. I plan to address the hash table scalability using
re-sizable hash tables as suggested by David Laight and David Miller [2]
This series addresses RDS connection bottlenecks on massive workloads and
impro
