On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:34:02PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> > What tree are you targetting with these changes? Do you expect
> > them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree?
> >
> > Please be explicit about this in the future.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't mention it.
>
> My expectation is that
From: David Daney
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:34:02 -0700
> On 03/14/2017 05:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Daney
>> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700
>>
>>> Changes from v1:
>>>
>>> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
>>>
>>> - Added three more patches for other problems fo
On 03/14/2017 05:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700
Changes from v1:
- Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
- Added three more patches for other problems found.
Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
ident
From: David Daney
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700
> Changes from v1:
>
> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
>
> - Added three more patches for other problems found.
>
>
> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
> identified some failures and unimp
On 03/14/2017 03:49 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:21:39PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
Changes from v1:
- Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
- Added three more patches for other problems found.
Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf mod
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:21:39PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Changes from v1:
>
> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
>
> - Added three more patches for other problems found.
>
>
> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
> identified some failures and un
On 03/14/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, David Daney wrote:
Changes from v1:
- Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
- Added three more patches for other problems found.
Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
identified some
On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, David Daney wrote:
Changes from v1:
- Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
- Added three more patches for other problems found.
Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
identified some failures and unimplemented features.
Nice, th
Changes from v1:
- Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
- Added three more patches for other problems found.
Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
identified some failures and unimplemented features.
With this patch set we get:
test_bpf: Summary: 305
