On 08/12/2015 11:36 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 08/12/2015 08:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:04:55PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 08/11/2015 11:49 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:35 -0700
Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part,
On 08/12/2015 08:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:04:55PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 08/11/2015 11:49 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:35 -0700
Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part, use fwnode_property* APIs.
The first patch
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:04:55PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 11:49 AM, David Miller wrote:
> >From: David Daney
> >Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:35 -0700
> >
> >>Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part, use fwnode_property* APIs.
> >>
> >>The first patch (1/2) rearranges the existing
From: Robert Richter
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 22:12:37 +0200
> On 11.08.15 13:04:55, David Daney wrote:
>> >In the future it might be better structured to try and get the OF
>> >node, and if that fails then try and use the ACPI method to obtain
>> >these values.
>>
>> Our current approach, as you
From: David Daney
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:04:55 -0700
> You seem to be recommending precedence for OF. It should be
> consistent across all drivers/sub-systems, so do you really think
> that OF before ACPI is the way to go?
I just think it's more hackish to test acpi_disabled than to
simply s
On 11.08.15 13:04:55, David Daney wrote:
> >In the future it might be better structured to try and get the OF
> >node, and if that fails then try and use the ACPI method to obtain
> >these values.
>
> Our current approach, as you can see in the patch, is the opposite. If ACPI
> is being used, pre
On 08/11/2015 11:49 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:35 -0700
Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part, use fwnode_property* APIs.
The first patch (1/2) rearranges the existing code a little with no
functional change to get ready for the second. The second
From: David Daney
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:35 -0700
> Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part, use fwnode_property* APIs.
>
> The first patch (1/2) rearranges the existing code a little with no
> functional change to get ready for the second. The second (2/2) does
> the actual work of adding
From: David Daney
Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part, use fwnode_property* APIs.
The first patch (1/2) rearranges the existing code a little with no
functional change to get ready for the second. The second (2/2) does
the actual work of adding support to extract the needed information
from
