On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Vallish Vaidyeshwara wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 11:47:56AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > So if we need to replace all 'legacy' timers to high resolution timer,
> > > because some application was _relying_ on jiffies being kind of precise,
> > > maybe it is better to
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 11:47:56AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 11:55 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:26:45AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: David Woodhouse
> > > > Da
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 11:55 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:26:45AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: David Woodhouse
> > > Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:23:22 +0100
> > >
> > > > I don't know that anyone's e
From: Eduardo Valentin
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:55:21 -0700
> I agree. I would prefer to understand here what is the technical
> reason not to accept these patches other than "use other system
> calls".
I explained this, let me reiterate:
And most importantly, letting the k
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 11:55 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:26:45AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse
> > Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:23:22 +0100
> >
> > > I don't know that anyone's ever tried saying "show me the chapter
> and
> > > verse
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:26:45AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse
> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:23:22 +0100
>
> > I don't know that anyone's ever tried saying "show me the chapter and
> > verse of the documentation"
>
> Do you know why I brought this up? Because the pe
From: David Woodhouse
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:23:22 +0100
> I don't know that anyone's ever tried saying "show me the chapter and
> verse of the documentation"
Do you know why I brought this up? Because the person I am replying
to told me that the syscall documentation should have suggested t
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eduardo Valentin
> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:04:09 -0700
>
> >
> > However, this is a clear, the system call, from the net subsystem,
> > has changed in behavior across kernel versions. From application /
> > userspace perspective, ch
From: Eduardo Valentin
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:04:09 -0700
> However, this is a clear, the system call, from the net subsystem,
> has changed in behavior across kernel versions. From application /
> userspace perspective, changing the system call without clear
> documentation or deprecation path
David,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:30:30PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vallish Vaidyeshwara
> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:10:25 +
>
> > I am submitting 2 patch series to enable hires timer to timeout
> > datagram sockets (AF_UNIX & AF_INET domain) and test code to test
> > timeout accura
From: Vallish Vaidyeshwara
> Sent: 27 August 2017 21:47
...
> I respect the decision not to upstream this patch series, however I
> wanted to provide additional details. Application wanting high
> resolution events with real guarantees is not the case, but the case
> here is regression in system ca
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:30:30PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vallish Vaidyeshwara
> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:10:25 +
>
> > I am submitting 2 patch series to enable hires timer to timeout
> > datagram sockets (AF_UNIX & AF_INET domain) and test code to test
> > timeout accuracy on th
From: Vallish Vaidyeshwara
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:10:25 +
> I am submitting 2 patch series to enable hires timer to timeout
> datagram sockets (AF_UNIX & AF_INET domain) and test code to test
> timeout accuracy on these sockets.
This is not reasonable.
If you want high resolution events
v1->v2:
- Cong Wang pointed out MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT wraparound, fixed the
patch 1/2 to accommodate MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT wait time
- Changed format of printing total time from float to long in
selftests patch 2/2
Hello Dave,
Resending the patch series to include netdev mailing list with a
14 matches
Mail list logo
