From: Andrew Goodbody
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:49:34 +
> Sorry, I had no notification that this had happened. However I
> thought that the plan was to revert v1 and go with David Rivshin's
> patch instead. I'll see if I can create a revert in a little while.
Yes, that's fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Goodbody
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:53:25 +0100
>
> > This is a fix for a NULL pointer dereference from cpsw which is
> > triggered by having two slave PHYs attached to a cpsw network device.
> > The problem is due to only maintaining a single referenc
From: Andrew Goodbody
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:53:25 +0100
> This is a fix for a NULL pointer dereference from cpsw which is triggered
> by having two slave PHYs attached to a cpsw network device. The problem is
> due to only maintaining a single reference to a PHY node in the prive data
> which
Resend to add more people on Cc: as requested by Grygrii Strashko.
This is a fix for a NULL pointer dereference from cpsw which is triggered
by having two slave PHYs attached to a cpsw network device. The problem is
due to only maintaining a single reference to a PHY node in the prive data
which g
This is a fix for a NULL pointer dereference from cpsw which is triggered
by having two slave PHYs attached to a cpsw network device. The problem is
due to only maintaining a single reference to a PHY node in the prive data
which gets overwritten by the second PHY probe. So move the PHY node
refere
