Re: [PATCH v2] vrf: Fix conntrack-dnat conflict in vrf-device PREROUTING hook

2019-01-13 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi wenxu, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master] [also build test ERROR on v5.0-rc1 next-20190111] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/

Re: [PATCH v2] vrf: Fix conntrack-dnat conflict in vrf-device PREROUTING hook

2019-01-11 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi wenxu, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master] [also build test ERROR on v5.0-rc1 next-20190111] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/

Re: [PATCH v2] vrf: Fix conntrack-dnat conflict in vrf-device PREROUTING hook

2019-01-11 Thread David Ahern
On 1/10/19 10:53 PM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote: > From: wenxu > > In the ip_rcv the skb go through the PREROUTING hook first, > Then jump in vrf device go through the same hook again. > When conntrack dnat work with vrf, there will be some conflict for rules. > Because the package go through the hook

[PATCH v2] vrf: Fix conntrack-dnat conflict in vrf-device PREROUTING hook

2019-01-10 Thread wenxu
From: wenxu In the ip_rcv the skb go through the PREROUTING hook first, Then jump in vrf device go through the same hook again. When conntrack dnat work with vrf, there will be some conflict for rules. Because the package go through the hook twice with different nf status ip link add user1 type