On 01/18/2018 10:35 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There is a static checker warning that "proglen" has an upper bound but
> no lower bound. The allocation will just fail harmlessly so it's not a
> big deal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Applied to bpf-next, thanks Dan! (I changed the prefix fro
There is a static checker warning that "proglen" has an upper bound but
no lower bound. The allocation will just fail harmlessly so it's not a
big deal.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
v2: change the type to unsigned instead of checking for negatives
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c b/t
