On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:06:12PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > consume_skb() isn't for drop or error cases
>
> for drop or error -> for error
>
> > that kfree_skb() is more proper
> > one. At this patch, it fixed tpacket_rcv() and p
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> consume_skb() isn't for drop or error cases
for drop or error -> for error
> that kfree_skb() is more proper
> one. At this patch, it fixed tpacket_rcv() and packet_rcv() to be
> consistent for error or non-error cases letting perf trace i
consume_skb() isn't for drop or error cases that kfree_skb() is more proper
one. At this patch, it fixed tpacket_rcv() and packet_rcv() to be
consistent for error or non-error cases letting perf trace its event
properly.
Signed-off-by: Weongyo Jeong
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 16
