Andreas,
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200
Andreas Christoforou wrote:
> The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1].
> Instead of dynamic allocation, just use XFRM_MAX_DEPTH
> as already done for the "class" array, but as per feedback,
> I will not drop maxclass because that c
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:26:44PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:18:46 -0800
> Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200
> > > Andreas Christoforou wrote:
> > >
> > >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/x
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:18:46 -0800
Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200
> > Andreas Christoforou wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
> >> index b15075a..270a53a 100644
> >> --
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200
> Andreas Christoforou wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
>> index b15075a..270a53a 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
>> @@ -62,7
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200
Andreas Christoforou wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
> index b15075a..270a53a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ __xfrm6_sort(void **dst, void **src, int n, int (*cmp)(vo
The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1].
Instead of dynamic allocation, just use XFRM_MAX_DEPTH
as already done for the "class" array, but as per feedback,
I will not drop maxclass because that changes the behavior.
In one case, it'll do this loop up to 5, the other
caller up t
