On 26.07.16 17:26, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
+ CC: Ivan
On 07/26/2016 05:09 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 07/26/2016 03:57 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:54:45 +0200
Such a big dump of register values is hardly useful on a production
system.
Ano
+ CC: Ivan
On 07/26/2016 05:09 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 07/26/2016 03:57 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:54:45 +0200
Such a big dump of register values is hardly useful on a production
system.
Another downside of the now removed functions is t
On 07/26/2016 03:57 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:54:45 +0200
Such a big dump of register values is hardly useful on a production
system.
Another downside of the now removed functions is that calling
emac_dump_regs resulted in at least 87 calls to de
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:54:45 +0200
> Such a big dump of register values is hardly useful on a production
> system.
>
> Another downside of the now removed functions is that calling
> emac_dump_regs resulted in at least 87 calls to dev_info while holding a
> spinlock and
Such a big dump of register values is hardly useful on a production
system.
Another downside of the now removed functions is that calling
emac_dump_regs resulted in at least 87 calls to dev_info while holding a
spinlock and having irqs off which is a big source of latency.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Klei
