From: Al Viro
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 21:48:23 +0100
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>
>> Looks good, if so, we don't need the csum_error any more,
>
> Acked-by: Al Viro
>
> Dave, I could put that through my tree, but I think it would be better off
> in net.git
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> Looks good, if so, we don't need the csum_error any more,
Acked-by: Al Viro
Dave, I could put that through my tree, but I think it would be better off
in net.git; either way, it needs to go into mainline before -final...
On 2017/4/29 10:46, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:38:48AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> The patch 327868212381 (make skb_copy_datagram_msg() et.al. preserve
>> ->msg_iter on error) will revert the iov buffer if copy to iter
>> failed, but it didn't copy any datagram if the skb_chec
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:38:48AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> The patch 327868212381 (make skb_copy_datagram_msg() et.al. preserve
> ->msg_iter on error) will revert the iov buffer if copy to iter
> failed, but it didn't copy any datagram if the skb_checksum_complete
> error, so no need to rever
The patch 327868212381 (make skb_copy_datagram_msg() et.al. preserve
->msg_iter on error) will revert the iov buffer if copy to iter
failed, but it didn't copy any datagram if the skb_checksum_complete
error, so no need to revert any data at this place.
v2: Sabrina notice that return -EFAULT when
