On 2018/4/12 10:21, arvindY wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2018 07:00 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(),
On Thursday 12 April 2018 07:00 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(), which is only
set as ".probe" in stru
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(), which is only
set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
>
> de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(), which is only
> set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, de4x5_hw_init()
> calls
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(), which is only
set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, de4x5_hw_init()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced
