On 04/18/2017 06:40 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 04/18/2017 06:23 AM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>> On 01/04/2017 03:33 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 12/02/2016 09:48 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Peppe, any thoughts on this?
>
> I share what you say.
>
> In sum, the EEE m
On 04/18/2017 06:23 AM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 03:33 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 12/02/2016 09:48 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Peppe, any thoughts on this?
I share what you say.
In sum, the EEE management inside the stmmac is:
- the driver look
On 01/04/2017 03:33 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/02/2016 09:48 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Peppe, any thoughts on this?
>>>
>>> I share what you say.
>>>
>>> In sum, the EEE management inside the stmmac is:
>>>
>>> - the driver looks at own HW cap register if EEE is supported
>>>
>>>
On 12/02/2016 09:48 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Peppe, any thoughts on this?
>>
>> I share what you say.
>>
>> In sum, the EEE management inside the stmmac is:
>>
>> - the driver looks at own HW cap register if EEE is supported
>>
>> (indeed the user could keep disable EEE if bugged on some
On 12/02/2016 01:11 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hi Florian
> sorry for my delay.
>
> On 11/24/2016 7:23 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> +Peppe,
>>
>> Le 24/11/2016 à 07:38, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
As for enabling advertising and correct working of cpsw do you mean it
would be better to
Hi Florian
sorry for my delay.
On 11/24/2016 7:23 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
+Peppe,
Le 24/11/2016 à 07:38, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
As for enabling advertising and correct working of cpsw do you mean it
would be better to disable EEE in any PHY on cpsw initialization as
long as cpsw doesn't pro
+Peppe,
Le 24/11/2016 à 07:38, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>> As for enabling advertising and correct working of cpsw do you mean it
>> would be better to disable EEE in any PHY on cpsw initialization as
>> long as cpsw doesn't provide support for EEE?
>>
>> We observe some strange behavior with our gig
> As for enabling advertising and correct working of cpsw do you mean it
> would be better to disable EEE in any PHY on cpsw initialization as
> long as cpsw doesn't provide support for EEE?
>
> We observe some strange behavior with our gigabit PHYs and a link
> partner in a EEE-capable unmanaged
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 12:08 PM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Florian Fainelli
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2016 06:38 AM, yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Yegor Yefremov
Add the ability to query and
On 11/23/2016 12:08 PM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Florian Fainelli
> wrote:
>> On 11/23/2016 06:38 AM, yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>> From: Yegor Yefremov
>>>
>>> Add the ability to query and set Energy Efficient Ethernet parameters
>>> via ethtool for appli
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 06:38 AM, yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> From: Yegor Yefremov
>>
>> Add the ability to query and set Energy Efficient Ethernet parameters
>> via ethtool for applicable devices.
>
> Are you sure this is enough to actual
On 11/23/2016 06:38 AM, yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
> From: Yegor Yefremov
>
> Add the ability to query and set Energy Efficient Ethernet parameters
> via ethtool for applicable devices.
Are you sure this is enough to actually enable EEE? I don't see where
phy_init_eee() is called here, no
Acked-by: Rami Rosen
From: Yegor Yefremov
Add the ability to query and set Energy Efficient Ethernet parameters
via ethtool for applicable devices.
Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov
---
Changes:
v2: make routines static (Rami Rosen)
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 26 ++
1 file change
14 matches
Mail list logo
