On 5/7/20 12:04 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 10:03:52PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
The '==' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool again.
This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
Make sense.
It may belong to bpf-next instead.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai La
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 10:03:52PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
> The '==' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool again.
> This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
Make sense.
It may belong to bpf-next instead.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau
On May 6, 2020 7:03:52 AM PDT, Jason Yan wrote:
>The '==' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool
>again.
>This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
>
>arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1478:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
>not needed here
>arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1479:50-
The '==' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool again.
This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1478:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
not needed here
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1479:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
not needed here
Signed-
