Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
It was hardly necessary to repeat most of the code from gfar_error() in
gfar_interrupt(), especially having some inconsistencies between the two.
So, make the gfar_interrupt() just call gfar_error(), and not acknowledge
the interrupts itself as gfar_{receive/transmit/error}
On Feb 15, 2007, at 07:56, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
It was hardly necessary to repeat most of the code from gfar_error
() in
gfar_interrupt(), especially having some inconsistencies between
the two.
So, make the gfar_interrupt() just call gfar_error(), and not
acknowledge
the interrupts itse
It was hardly necessary to repeat most of the code from gfar_error() in
gfar_interrupt(), especially having some inconsistencies between the two.
So, make the gfar_interrupt() just call gfar_error(), and not acknowledge
the interrupts itself as gfar_{receive/transmit/error}() do it anyway.
While at
