On 2017/8/15 22:03, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 06:58 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 22:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Ding Tianhong
>>> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:23:22 +0800
>>>
Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 06:58 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 22:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ding Tianhong
> > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:23:22 +0800
> >
> > > Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
> > > Ordering Attribute set. Thi
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 22:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ding Tianhong
> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:23:22 +0800
>
> > Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
> > Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
> > PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAX
From: Ding Tianhong
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:23:22 +0800
> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
> Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known
> devices with
Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known
devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the
cxgb4 dr