On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:59:52PM -0700, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:54 PM David Miller wrote:
> >
> > From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
> > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:41:50 -0700
> >
> > > Is 100 in fact acceptable for new code? 120? 180? What's the
> > > generally accepted l
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:54 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:41:50 -0700
>
> > Is 100 in fact acceptable for new code? 120? 180? What's the
> > generally accepted limit these days?
>
> Please keep it as close to 80 columns as possible.
>
> Line b
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:41:50 -0700
> Is 100 in fact acceptable for new code? 120? 180? What's the
> generally accepted limit these days?
Please keep it as close to 80 columns as possible.
Line breaks are not ugly, please embrace them :)
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:22 PM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:11:02 +0200
> "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote:
>
> > +static int walk_by_peer(struct allowedips_node __rcu *top, u8 bits, struct
> > allowedips_cursor *cursor, struct wireguard_peer *peer, int (*func)(void
> > *ctx,
