From: Yuki Machida
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:49:58 +0900
> ping? thanks.
If your patch is properly queued in patchwork, you never need to do
pings on the mailing list like this.
Someone knows the patch need to be dealt with, and if it is not being
reviewed it simply means that other patches are
ping? thanks.
On 2016年02月03日 10:56, Yuki Machida wrote:
> Please apply the following patch to v4.1.x.
>
> By commit 6fd99094de2b ("ipv6: Don't reduce hop limit for an interface")
> that have been added in the 4.0-rc7, it no longer comply with RFC4861.
> This problem has been fixed in the commit 8
Please apply the following patch to v4.1.x.
By commit 6fd99094de2b ("ipv6: Don't reduce hop limit for an interface")
that have been added in the 4.0-rc7, it no longer comply with RFC4861.
This problem has been fixed in the commit 8013d1d7eafb
("net/ipv6: add sysctl option accept_ra_min_hop_limit"
